Hello there, fellow English Education Students!
Welcome to the third review of Understanding Student Differences. Last week we
have talked about the ‘blue print’ about what this journal going to be, we all
know this journal will speak 3 important key points which are:
Learning Style
Approaches to
Learning and Orientation to Studying
Intellectual
Development
However, on this occasion we will talk about the
methodology of this journal, yup before going deep into the journal we must
know what methods did Professor Richard used for this journal? Knowing its
methodology surely will help us understand the journal comprehensively. So, put
your attention and check it out!
The journal will describe how student learn and their
determined skill by it through variety of assessment, the assessment result
will be considered as data later on. The data is indeed guaranteed to be
reliable and valid which means there will be consistent result whether if the test
has been repeated and the purpose of the data has serve its purpose properly.
The journal will use Olds, Moskal, and Miller
analysis on data reliability and validity, which are:
Text-retest reliability: This will be a proper tool
to test the stability of the data and research
Internal consistency reliability: Data should be correlated
relationship with the main purpose of the journal with the necessary quantities.
Scale orthogonality: the scales for the instrument to
test the reliability and validity of the data are independent
Construct validity: The instrument will indeed has a relevant
result exactly like the purpose of this journal.
Also, in each point of this journal, Professor
Richard will offer us a future research question that could be our inspiration
to choose what topic you should choose for your research? For example, in the end
of Learning Styles section, as you can see, Professor Richard has given us 11
eleven further study questions; indeed this journal will be helpful for all of
us. Good luck!
No comments:
Post a Comment